Help us get to over 8,756 articles in 2024.
If you know of a magician not listed in MagicPedia, start a New Biography for them. Contact us at magicpediahelp@gmail.com
User talk:Philippe billot: Difference between revisions
(Chronological order of publication?) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[[User:TStone|TStone]] 21:40, 19 February 2009 (EST) | --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 21:40, 19 February 2009 (EST) | ||
== Chronological order of publication? == | |||
Hello. I wonder... When talking about an effect, isn't it best to first name the original publication, and then any eventual re-publications? | |||
Like in [[Re-Set]]. In that order, the re-publication before the original publication, it is easy to confuse things, and accidentally get the idea that Re-Set first was published in 1996. --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 23:24, 12 April 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:24, 12 April 2009
Welcome!
Hello, Philippe billot, and welcome to MagicPedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay to contribute some more!.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
MagicPedia is built on the same software as Wikipedia, so these pages over there may help too:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a MagicPedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you need help, check out MagicPedia_Development, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Jpecore 01:51, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
Ace Assembly Reference
Since you've been editing the "Ace Assembly" page - the link to the Genii Forum in the references is not leading to any relevant page. I didn't find the proper page, otherwise I would have fixed it myself. --TStone 21:40, 19 February 2009 (EST)
- I fixed the link. Joe 22:26, 19 February 2009 (EST)
Also, if you have any interest in this topic, here is my take on the effect :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blHnxRrj4mc
--TStone 21:40, 19 February 2009 (EST)
Chronological order of publication?
Hello. I wonder... When talking about an effect, isn't it best to first name the original publication, and then any eventual re-publications?
Like in Re-Set. In that order, the re-publication before the original publication, it is easy to confuse things, and accidentally get the idea that Re-Set first was published in 1996. --TStone 23:24, 12 April 2009 (EDT)