Help us get to over 8,749 articles in 2024.

If you know of a magician not listed in MagicPedia, start a New Biography for them. Contact us at magicpediahelp@gmail.com

Difference between revisions of "Jordan Count"

From Magicpedia, the free online encyclopedia for magicians by magicians.
Jump to: navigation, search
(History)
m
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A false card display showing four cards as four, hiding the fourth card.
+
The '''Jordan Count''' is a false card display showing four cards as four while actually hiding the fourth card.
  
After the count, it usually leaves the cards in perfect order to do an [[Elmsley Count]].
+
After the count, it leaves the cards in perfect order to do an [[Elmsley Count]] to hide the same card again.
 +
  
Described in "Charles Jordan's Best Card tricks", 1992, compiled by Karl Fulves.
+
== History ==
 +
First published by [[Charles Jordan]] in [[Thirty Card Mysteries]] (1919) under his ''Phantom Aces'' trick. Also described in [[Charles Jordan's Best Card Tricks]] (1992), compiled by [[Karl Fulves]].
  
[[Ed Marlo]] tried to claim credit for the sleight(1), retitling it The [[Flexible Count]] and publishing variations in [[The New Tops]].
+
It was brought back to light again in 1963 by the British magician [[Francis Haxton]].<ref>[[Charles Jordan's Best Card Tricks]] by Karl Fulves, page 247. But in [[Epilogue]] no. 9, july 1970, page 72, Karl Fulves writes : " [[Fred Lowe]] pointed out that the Phantom Aces in Jordan [[Thirty Card Mysteries]] anticipated by nearly a half century the Four-As-Four or [[Ghost Count]]." It's only in Epilogue no. 10, November 70, page 75 that ''Jordan's 4-as-4 Count'' by [[Francis Haxton]] was described.</ref>
  
(1) Not exactly ! Excerpt from The New Tops, december 1963 : "(This count) embodies the elements of the Elmsley Ghost Count, increases the application of the Ellis Satnyon Count, as well as the Elmsley, in that it can be done with a greater number of cards because of a controlled dealing action."
+
Many have also recreated this sleight over the years:
  
Compare with this : Excerpt from Hugard's Magic Monthly, Vol. 21, 3, november 1963, page 18. "Modified Elmsley Count" by Norman HOUGHTON. In this count, he describes in fact the Jordan Count.
+
*[[Ed Marlo]] created it as the [[Flexible Count]] and published variations in The [[New Tops]]. <ref>Excerpt from The [[New Tops]], December 1963 : "(This count) embodies the elements of the Elmsley Ghost Count, increases the application of the Ellis Stanyon Count, as well as the Elmsley, in that it can be done with a greater number of cards because of a controlled dealing action."</ref>
 +
 
 +
*''Modified Elmsley Count'' by [[Norman Houghton]] in [[Hugard's Magic Monthly]], Vol. 21, no. 3, november 1963, page 18, was the same as the Jordan Count.
  
Marlo and Houghton both quote Elmsley but not Jordan. Why only Houhgton gets the benefit of the doubt ?
 
 
 
== Variations ==
 
== Variations ==
*Double Jordan by David Evans, X cards as five count, only 3 faces seen, Apocalypse Vol. 7, N° 3, march 1984, page 895.
+
*''Modified Jordan Count'' by Larry Jennings, for five cards, [[Larry Jennings on Card and Coin Handling]] (1977).
*Modified Jordan Count by Larry Jennings, for five cards, Larry Jennings on Card & Coin Handling.
+
*[[Jorback Count]] by [[Phil Goldstein]], mates the Back Count (aka Flustration Count) with the Jordan Count using the Biddle Grip, The [[Linking Ring]], Vol. 62, no. 10, October 1982, page 75.
*McCount by John McClure, accomplishing the same as Jordan Count, Apocalypse Vol. 20, N° 9, september 1997, page 2835.
+
*''Double Jordan'' by [[David Evans]], X cards as five count, only 3 faces seen, [[Apocalypse]] Vol. 7, no. 3, march 1984, page 895.
*[[Jorback Count]] by Phil Goldstein, mates the Back Count (aka Flustration Count) with the Jordan Count using the Biddle Grip, The Linking Ring, October 1982.
+
*''McCount'' by [[John McClure]], accomplishing the same as Jordan Count, [[Apocalypse]] Vol. 20, no. 9, september 1997, page 2835.
 
+
== History ==
+
First published by [[Charles Jordan]] in Thirty Card Mysteries (1919) under his Phantom Aces trick.  It was brought back to light in 1963 by British magician [[Francis Haxton]].<sup>1</sup>
+
 
+
<sup>1</sup>Charles Jordan's Best Card Tricks by Karl Fulves, page 247.
+
 
+
But in Epilogue N° 9, july 1970, page 72, Karl Fulves writes : "Fred LOWE recently pointed out that the Phantom Aces in Jordan Thirty Card Mysteries anticipated by nearly a half century the Four-As-Four or Ghost Count in use today."
+
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 +
<references />
 +
* ''You Can't Count On Jordan'' by [[Jon Racherbaumer]] page 3 in [[Sticks & Stones]] no. 1, January 1977.
 
*http://archive.denisbehr.de/archive/route/entries.php?url=10,745,468,602
 
*http://archive.denisbehr.de/archive/route/entries.php?url=10,745,468,602
  
 
[[Category:False Counts]]
 
[[Category:False Counts]]

Latest revision as of 22:06, 14 December 2011

The Jordan Count is a false card display showing four cards as four while actually hiding the fourth card.

After the count, it leaves the cards in perfect order to do an Elmsley Count to hide the same card again.


History

First published by Charles Jordan in Thirty Card Mysteries (1919) under his Phantom Aces trick. Also described in Charles Jordan's Best Card Tricks (1992), compiled by Karl Fulves.

It was brought back to light again in 1963 by the British magician Francis Haxton.[1]

Many have also recreated this sleight over the years:

Variations

References

  1. Charles Jordan's Best Card Tricks by Karl Fulves, page 247. But in Epilogue no. 9, july 1970, page 72, Karl Fulves writes : " Fred Lowe pointed out that the Phantom Aces in Jordan Thirty Card Mysteries anticipated by nearly a half century the Four-As-Four or Ghost Count." It's only in Epilogue no. 10, November 70, page 75 that Jordan's 4-as-4 Count by Francis Haxton was described.
  2. Excerpt from The New Tops, December 1963 : "(This count) embodies the elements of the Elmsley Ghost Count, increases the application of the Ellis Stanyon Count, as well as the Elmsley, in that it can be done with a greater number of cards because of a controlled dealing action."