User talk:Philippe billot

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(answer)
(answer)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
Thanks! Good to know. A pity that not more people are actively involved with this Wiki. Perhaps one should have an "Article of the week" thread at the Genii forum, to lure more people in?--[[User:TStone|TStone]] 02:41, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
 
Thanks! Good to know. A pity that not more people are actively involved with this Wiki. Perhaps one should have an "Article of the week" thread at the Genii forum, to lure more people in?--[[User:TStone|TStone]] 02:41, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
 
: Good idea. If you have some in mind, nominate them here: [[MagicPedia_talk:Today%27s_featured_article]]. I'll use it for the MainPage Feature article too. [[User:Jpecore|Joe]] 05:30, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
 
: Good idea. If you have some in mind, nominate them here: [[MagicPedia_talk:Today%27s_featured_article]]. I'll use it for the MainPage Feature article too. [[User:Jpecore|Joe]] 05:30, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Year categorization ==
 +
We decided to group years by century rather then decades. I'll take care of fixing them all though!  I just wanted you to be aware of the change in direction. See [[Category talk:Years]] for more info.  [[User:Jpecore|Joe P.]] 17:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:10, 31 January 2010

Contents

Welcome!

Hello, Philippe billot, and welcome to MagicPedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay to contribute some more!.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

MagicPedia is built on the same software as Wikipedia, so these pages over there may help too:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a MagicPedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need help, check out MagicPedia_Development, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Jpecore 01:51, 22 March 2008 (EDT)

Ace Assembly Reference

Since you've been editing the "Ace Assembly" page - the link to the Genii Forum in the references is not leading to any relevant page. I didn't find the proper page, otherwise I would have fixed it myself. --TStone 21:40, 19 February 2009 (EST)

I fixed the link. Joe 22:26, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Also, if you have any interest in this topic, here is my take on the effect :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blHnxRrj4mc

--TStone 21:40, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Chronological order of publication?

Hello. I wonder... When talking about an effect, isn't it best to first name the original publication, and then any eventual re-publications?

Like in Re-Set. In that order, the re-publication before the original publication, it is easy to confuse things, and accidentally get the idea that Re-Set first was published in 1996. --TStone 23:24, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

answer

Good morning Tom,

At the beginning, the order was alphabetical, then chronological but there are some articles with date before the reference or other with date at the end of the reference.

But you are right. To avoid confusion, il will be better to have the first date of publication like this:

  • (1977) Reset in Supermagic by Paul Harris, reprint in 1996 in Art of Asthonisment.

User:Philippe billot

I think Tom was speaking of the first sentence of the article. I agree that it makes more sense to list the publications in chronological order there too. I'll make the change. Just an FYI, there is also a "Discussion" link on every article where you can leave notes like this too (that way more people may see the discussion) Joe 07:58, 13 April 2009 (EDT)

I agree.

User:Philippe billot

Thanks! Good to know. A pity that not more people are actively involved with this Wiki. Perhaps one should have an "Article of the week" thread at the Genii forum, to lure more people in?--TStone 02:41, 14 April 2009 (EDT)

Good idea. If you have some in mind, nominate them here: MagicPedia_talk:Today's_featured_article. I'll use it for the MainPage Feature article too. Joe 05:30, 14 April 2009 (EDT)

Year categorization

We decided to group years by century rather then decades. I'll take care of fixing them all though! I just wanted you to be aware of the change in direction. See Category talk:Years for more info. Joe P. 17:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Interaction
Support our sponsor
Share
Print/export
Toolbox