Help us get to over 8,749 articles in 2024.

If you know of a magician not listed in MagicPedia, start a New Biography for them. Contact us at magicpediahelp@gmail.com

Difference between revisions of "Linking Ring Manipulation"

From Magicpedia, the free online encyclopedia for magicians by magicians.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add preface)
m (Change all-caps to capital-and-small letters.)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
== Preface ==
 
== Preface ==
  
PREFACE
+
Before going into the subject of this work, I should like to  correct an erroneous impression that has reached me from the Atlantic coast.
  
BEFORE GOING INTO THE SUBJECT OF THIS WORK, I SHOULD LIKE TO
+
In "Cut and Restored Rope Manipulation" I saw fit to criticize the ethics employed by the Tarbell system in marketing the Tarbell course. Many people have misunderstood that to mean a personal reflection on Dr. Tarbell. Without deviating from my original views, as previously expressed, please be assured that there was no personal reflection on Dr. Tarbell, or enmity intended. I have admired Dr. Tarbell and his work for a long time. My opinion of the Tarbell course is that it is the greatest individual work on magic. Anyone seriously interested in magic, who does not possess it, is depriving himself of one of magic's greatest tools.  
CORRECT AN ERRONEOUS IMPRESSION THAT HAS REACHED ME FROM THE ATLANTIC COAST.  
+
  
IN "CUT AND RESTORED ROPE MANIPULATION" I SAW FIT TO CRITICIZE
+
I might say in the same connection that in spite of the fact that I criticized U. F. Grant's rope methods, there was no personal enmity involved. And neither did I mean that I did not like other effects of his own origination. Quite to the contrary.  
THE ETHICS EMPLOYED BY THE TARBELL SYSTEM IN MARKETING THE TARBELL
+
COURSE. MANY PEOPLE HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD THAT TO MEAN A PERSONAL
+
REFLECTION ON DR. TARBELL. WITHOUT DEVIATING FROM MY ORIGINAL VIEWS,  
+
AS PREVIOUSLY EXPRESSED, PLEASE BE ASSURED THAT THERE WAS NO PERSONAL REFLECTION ON DR. TARBELL, OR ENMITY INTENDED. I HAVE ADMIRED
+
DR. TARBELL AND HIS WORK FOR A LONG TIME. MY OPINION OF THE TARBELL
+
COURSE IS THAT IT IS THE GREATEST INDIVIDUAL WORK ON MAGIC. ANYONE
+
SERIOUSLY INTERESTED IN MAGIC, WHO DOES NOT POSSESS IT, IS DEPRIVING
+
HIMSELF OF ONE OF MAGIC'S GREATEST TOOLS.  
+
  
I MIGHT SAY IN THE SAME CONNECTION THAT IN SPITE OF THE FACT
+
And again, what I might like you might not like - and so on. Personal views are not always conclusive. This is not an apology, for an apology is not necessary. It is simply an explanation of facts that I had thought were well understood.  
THAT I CRITICIZED U. F. GRANT'S ROPE METHODS, THERE WAS NO PERSONAL
+
ENMITY INVOLVED. AND NEITHER DID I MEAN THAT I DID NOT LIKE OTHER
+
EFFECTS OF HIS OWN ORIGINATION. QUITE TO THE CONTRARY.  
+
  
AND AGAIN, WHAT I MIGHT LIKE YOU MIGHT NOT LIKE - AND SO ON.
+
From what some of the critics have had to say about "Cut and Restored Rope Manipulation" and "Jumbo Card Manipulation" you probably think I travel about with a black mask and a cannon - or a cutlass in my teeth.  
PERSONAL VIEWS ARE NOT ALWAYS CONCLUSIVE. THIS IS NOT AN APOLOGY,
+
FOR AN APOLOGY IS NOT NECESSARY. IT IS SIMPLY AN EXPLANATION OF
+
FACTS THAT I HAD THOUGHT WERE WELL UNDERSTOOD.  
+
  
FROM WHAT SOME OF THE CRITICS HAVE HAD TO SAY ABOUT "CUT AND
+
I assure you I haven't found that necessary yet. Perhaps I shall have to do so for personal protection.  
RESTORED ROPE MANIPULATION" AND "JUMBO CARD MANIPULATION" YOU PROBABLY THINK I TRAVEL ABOUT WITH A BLACK MASK AND A CANNON - OR A
+
CUTLASS IN MY TEETH.  
+
  
I ASSURE YOU I HAVEN'T FOUND THAT NECESSARY YET. PERHAPS I  
+
You may recall that I didn't claim as my own invention anything that appeared in the rope book. Some of the things in the jumbo card book I did claim.  
SHALL HAVE TO DO SO FOR PERSONAL PROTECTION.  
+
  
YOU MAY RECALL THAT I DIDN'T CLAIM AS MY OWN INVENTION ANYTHING
+
Honestly, I did think I had devised some of it myself. But it doesn't matter much whether I did or not.  
THAT APPEARED IN THE ROPE BOOK. SOME OF THE THINGS IN THE JUMBO CARD
+
BOOK I DID CLAIM.  
+
  
HONESTLY, I DID THINK I HAD DEVISED SOME OF IT MYSELF. BUT IT
+
Now I want to assure you that my age is slightly over thirty. They say the linking ring trick is several hundred years old. ''I did not invent the linking ring trick!'' That is that.  
DOESN'T MATTER MUCH WHETHER I DID OR NOT.  
+
  
NOW I WANT TO ASSURE YOU THAT MY AGE IS SLIGHTLY OVER THIRTY.  
+
But I know your interests are not in this sort of thing. Before we get into the subject I should like to caution you to guard the secrets to be revealed to you shortly. They are valuable. I know you will find them effective and exclusive.  
THEY SAY THE LINKING RING TRICK IS SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS OLD.  
+
''I DID NOT INVENT THE LINKING RING TRICK!'' THAT IS THAT.  
+
  
BUT I KNOW YOUR INTERESTS ARE NOT IN THIS SORT OF THING.
+
Dariel Fitzkee
BEFORE WE GET INTO THE SUBJECT I SHOULD LIKE TO CAUTION YOU
+
TO GUARD THE SECRETS TO BE REVEALED TO YOU SHORTLY. THEY ARE
+
VALUABLE. I KNOW YOU WILL FIND THEM EFFECTIVE AND EXCLUSIVE.
+
 
+
DARIEL FITZKEE
+
  
  

Latest revision as of 18:51, 14 October 2020

Linking Ring Manipulation
Fitzkee Linking Rings.jpg
AuthorDariel Fitzkee
PublisherThe American Studios
Publication Date1930
LanguageEnglish
Pages28
SubjectLinking Rings
 

Linking Ring Manipulation with an Original Ring Routine, "The Oriental Rings"


Preface

Before going into the subject of this work, I should like to correct an erroneous impression that has reached me from the Atlantic coast.

In "Cut and Restored Rope Manipulation" I saw fit to criticize the ethics employed by the Tarbell system in marketing the Tarbell course. Many people have misunderstood that to mean a personal reflection on Dr. Tarbell. Without deviating from my original views, as previously expressed, please be assured that there was no personal reflection on Dr. Tarbell, or enmity intended. I have admired Dr. Tarbell and his work for a long time. My opinion of the Tarbell course is that it is the greatest individual work on magic. Anyone seriously interested in magic, who does not possess it, is depriving himself of one of magic's greatest tools.

I might say in the same connection that in spite of the fact that I criticized U. F. Grant's rope methods, there was no personal enmity involved. And neither did I mean that I did not like other effects of his own origination. Quite to the contrary.

And again, what I might like you might not like - and so on. Personal views are not always conclusive. This is not an apology, for an apology is not necessary. It is simply an explanation of facts that I had thought were well understood.

From what some of the critics have had to say about "Cut and Restored Rope Manipulation" and "Jumbo Card Manipulation" you probably think I travel about with a black mask and a cannon - or a cutlass in my teeth.

I assure you I haven't found that necessary yet. Perhaps I shall have to do so for personal protection.

You may recall that I didn't claim as my own invention anything that appeared in the rope book. Some of the things in the jumbo card book I did claim.

Honestly, I did think I had devised some of it myself. But it doesn't matter much whether I did or not.

Now I want to assure you that my age is slightly over thirty. They say the linking ring trick is several hundred years old. I did not invent the linking ring trick! That is that.

But I know your interests are not in this sort of thing. Before we get into the subject I should like to caution you to guard the secrets to be revealed to you shortly. They are valuable. I know you will find them effective and exclusive.

Dariel Fitzkee


Contents

  • Introduction
  • The Old Routine
  • Methods of Gaining Possession of Concealed Key Ring
  • The Oriental Rings
  • Namreh's Solor Linking
  • Two Moves by Loyd Enochs
  • Literature on the Linking Rings
Book Navigation
Category:Books by author Category:Books by publisher Category:Books by year
Category:Classic Books Category:Series Category:Manuscripts
Early Magic Books Bibliographies Magic themed novels